Responding to a piece by Ryan Avent, the noted (and mysterious) German blogger Kantoos asks for help in coming up with ideas about how to reduce Germany’s current account surplus, apart from deregulating services.
Let me help him (or her). Germany could go some way to reversing the labour market reforms and the political pressure on the collective wage bargaining system that in the 2000s systematically both squeezed domestic demand and raised Germany ‘s price competitiveness, and were thus instrumental in the massive widening of the current account surplus. They also led to Germany recording one of the largest increases in inequality of all the OECD countries since the 1990s. Alongside policy reversals it could also introduce a statutory minimum wage: indeed even the CDU is now considering this.
I agree with Kantoos that the situation is changing and that Germany’s import absorption will increase. Yes, more fundamental mechanisms were behind the faster nominal wage and price increases in the euro area periphery and their mirror image in Germany before the crisis. But public policy – such as the Hartz reforms, the deregulation of non-standard forms of employment – played a role and such policies were very much predicated on a belief that reducing unemployment can only come through improved competitiveness. To that extent I don’t think it is strictly wrong, when Kantoos writes
What Germans (and hence their politicians) do care about is growth and unemployment. If the former is high, and the latter is low, nobody cares about the current account surplus.
but it is misleading. Most German policymakers fervently believe that growth and employment come and can only come from increasing exports. Finance minister Schaeuble famously compared reducing net exports to a situation where Bayern Munich deliberately played less skilful football so that it would lose to Olympique Marseille. Morover, the bare facts of pre-crisis Germany seemed to bear that out: domestic demand was stagnant and virtually all the (meagre) growth that was achieved came through higher net exports.
The only slight problem was that this was not a sustainable strategy for the largest single economy in the monetary union (and much less one that can be generalised to the whole euro area).
Kantoos is an astute observer of Germany and the euro area. But while I agree with much of this blog post, I am surprised that he (or she) appears to fall for the official discourse which is that competitive rebalancing must come from radical attacks on labour market and wage-setting institutions in deficit countries, while in surplus countries, well, we are not sure but liberalising shop opening hours would clearly be a good thing.
Hi Andrew,
thanks for this post. So introducing a statutory minimum wage and reversing parts of the labor market reforms are your proposals to reduce the German CA surplus, right? On reversing labor market reforms, I would like to hear some more explicit suggestions. Should Germany extend the unemployment benefits? Should it rely more strongly on collective wage bargaining?
And just to mention, I know quite a few people who consider the labor market reforms at least a partial success as structural unemployment has decreased significantly over the last couple of years. But there are opposing views who stress the importance of other factors like more flexible arrangements between employers and employees or structural weaknesses that have been overcome in the German economy (post reunification construction boom overhang, balance sheet adjustment of non-financial corporations after stock bubble). What's your take on this debate?
"What Germans (and hence their politicians) do care about is growth and unemployment."
Well that's what they claim to do. In fact the bundesbanker have more to say than we all think. The most important thing for Germans is Monetarism, meaning keep the inflation as low as possible. Both Monetarism and Caring about unemployment and growth doesn't fit together. You can't have all things together. Therefor the sentence above is wrong!
"Most German policymakers fervently believe that growth and employment come and can only come from increasing exports."
Well this is very true but only one side of the medal! German politicians oversee something. With the hartz4 reforms the wages decreased! But in the export sector most of the people get more money than minimum wage. So what does that mean? Some experts say that the hartz4 reform have done nothing to the German export boom!!! It is a very interesting conclusion which almost every politician in Germany disagree with.
The German CA is not good, not good for us Germans, nor for Europe. In fact Germans try to make Europe more German but in my honest opinion it is the wrong way!!!
Kindest regards from Germany!
Ger many has the second highest wages/benefits in the world after Switzerland. Norway, Sweden, Finland,Austria, Netherlands, Denmark, Japan, Hong Kong, Belgium, Canada and Australia, Eastern France, Northern Italy, Northern Spain have the highest wages/benefits in the World. All of these Regions/Countries have a Current Account Surplus except Australia and Canada very low population Countries with large Territories and Mineral Assets.